I liked Stolen more because I felt that the plot was easier to relate to, also I felt that the narration of Stolen was better.
I liked mad mans daughter more bc its easier to relate to as it has more than two characters. Plus, stolen was problematic.
I liked Stolen better because the beginning was more interesting and I was able to read more of the book. Stolen had a better plot and ending then Madman's Daughter.
i like nazi hunters as it was thrilling i like stuff about world war 2 so it was a great book plus it has stuff that spies do so win win
I liked Stolen more because i fell for how Gemma liked Ty. I found it more interesting how after being kidnapped Gemma did not give up and tried multiple times to escape from Ty. I also liked how Gemma was slowly actually falling for Ty and How the whole storey was just Gemma sending a letter about what had happened to Ty when Ty was in jail. I liked how stolen did not have a ending but allowed us to explore the possibilities of what could have happened.
i liked Stolen more because there wasn't as much romance. But Madman's Daughter had a science fiction type of thing that i enjoyed.
I really liked The Madman's Daughter more than Stolen. They were both unique but The Madman's Daughter had themes a lot more interesting like science, while Stolen only featured a romance theme. I think Juliet was a much better character than Gemma (I think that's her name) from stolen because she had an element of self.
I like Madman's Daughter better than Stolen because The Madman's Daughter had me wanting to keep reading and reading because of the mysterious element it has. For example, Juliet's father kept things to himself, making me want to discover more, and there was always something weird about the islanders.
I liked the Madman's Daughter more because it had a major cliff hanger but it is a trilogy so we get more answers. Stolen was open-ended and because it didn't have a definite conclusion, it was not my favorite.